Published: Feb. 27, 2014 By

If you talk about inequality in America, and if you want to read about it,ĢżThe New York TimesĀ columnist Paul Krugman andĀ are a safe bet for you. The economics Nobel laureate regularly writes about issues such as unemployment, minimum wage and social mobility ā€“ as in one of his most recent columns,ĢżĀ Ā He also published a variety of books, including his most recent one,ĢżA few days ago, Krugman provided his followers with two presentations he gave at Princeton University ā€“ one on, and the other onĀ .

Just recently, it seems, the Republican Party started to revise its strategy on how to help workers. In the Washington Monthlyā€™s blog ā€œPolitical Animal,ā€ Ed Kilgore posted anĀ , depicting an essential part of the Republican strategy for economic recovery. He wrote about how it took the GOP years to realize that solely focusing their efforts on ā€œjob-creatorsā€ wasnā€™t going to pay off ā€“ neither in electoral success, nor in economic recovery. He quoted Republican House majority leader Rep. Eric Cantor, saying that ā€œ90 percent of Americans work for someone else.ā€ In an early-February briefing, Cantor was reported to have ā€œrallied his troops on how to talk to people who donā€™t own their own businesses, and [those who] donā€™t view themselves as second-class citizens for working for somebody else.ā€

How tough a job Republican leadership is facing to uniteĀ its party behind a consistent approach to nourishing the economy shows the latest statement of Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal after a meeting of state governors at the White House. In its,ĢżNBCNews.comĀ paraphrased Jindalā€™s words as follows: ā€œ ā€˜The Obama economy is now the minimum wage economy,ā€™ Jindal said, accusing the president of ā€˜waving the white flag of surrenderā€™ on job growth.ā€ The column immediately follows up with a reaction of Democratic Connecticut Gov. Dan Malloy, who, according toĀ NBC News, said something as little judgmental as: ā€œThatā€™s the most insane statement Iā€™ve ever heard.ā€

The minimum wage debate continues to rage, and will likely set the tone for the upcoming midterm campaign season. As both parties try to shape their profiles, a speedy solution is utterly unexpected. As theĀ Washington Postā€™s Greg Sargent wrote in hisĀ , House Democrats are expected to try to force the Republican majority into a corner, filing a discharge petition to get a House vote on the minimum wage hike. Sargent attributes the information to a ā€œDemocratic leadership aide.ā€ House Republicans are most likely not going to sign the petition, but could still become pressured, Sargent writes in his story headlined ā€œDems ramp up pressure on minimum wage.ā€

Meanwhile Senate Democrats have pushed off a vote on raising the minimum wage to late March or early April,Ģż, citing scheduling conflicts and obstruction from Senate Republicans as reasons. Originally, Senate majority leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., had wanted to hold a vote in early March.

On theĀ Forbes MagazineĀ website, staff writer John Tamny offersĀ Ā on job safety, an issue that is at the center of the minimum wage debate. First, he declares it ā€œsureā€ that the mandatory pay-raise would render some unemployed as ā€œlabor is a cost like any other.ā€ But just a couple of lines further into his piece, Tamny opens up: ā€œWhere the right get it comically wrong is in their commentary about how minimum wages will force automation on companies as though this is a bad thing. No, itā€™s something we should embrace. Counterintuitive as it may seem, economic growth is all about theĀ destruction of workĀ ā€“ doing more with less labor inputs ā€“ on the way to higher profits.ā€